Buford Mill Dr Ste D Buford, GA 30519…

This article about Sally beauty near me

The Moral High Ground ArgumentA moral reasoner, or what has come to be called a moral relativist, might say that there is no moral absolute, only moral relativism as one side of the spectrum of ethics, and that whatever people agree on is what is morally right and what is wrong, without any kind of objective standard to which we could compare the situation. Unfortunately, as we look at the facts, it is actually quite simple and well known. The Moral High Ground ArgumentThe first question we ought to ask is, how do we know the moral high ground when there is no objective standard by which we could compare the current situation to the situation we might have had if everyone had agreed on what we all agreed. The standard for truth of moral claims is the standard of good morality in the minds of the person making the claim. This can be tested by looking at his history of making moral claims and asking him to justify each one in good faith, or by looking at the moral standards of the moral relativist, who would claim to not regard himself as moral relativist on any moral ground other than the morality thats right for me. If you are an extreme relativist, you will be able to claim that you are moral relativist, and that anything you choose to do is up to you. If moral relativism were true, it would mean that you could use morality to justify anything that happens to be in accord with your moral standards, without any kind of objective standards to the contrary. It is simply by assuming the moral high ground of the moral relativist, when the moral relativist has no moral high ground of his own. Now I am not saying that moral relativism is impossible. What I am saying is that the Moral High Ground Argument does not work because the moral relativist has no moral high ground of his own. The Moral High Ground Argument is a fallacy in which moral relativism is the end. So the moral high ground argument is fallacious, because it does not take the person making moral claims into account. If you are making moral claims, and they are not in accord with the moral relativists moral standards, then the moral relativist does not have any moral high ground on which to base his claim that youre a bad person. If you are a moral relativist, you are moral absolutism. There is no moral absolute, as there is no objective standard by which we could compare the current situation to the situation that we would have had if everyone agreed on what we all agreed.

Post about Sally beauty near me